Scientific Diagrams

Author

Gabriela Palomo-Munoz

Published

October 15, 2022

Scientific Diagrams

The following diagrams are not organized in any particular order. At some point, when I have several linked, I’ll organize them by categories.

  1. Soares et al. 2022

Islands are becoming taxonomically and functionally more similar after losing unique bird species and gaining common widespread birds.

  1. Pilowsky et al. 2022

Modeling the mechanisms that govern the structure and dynamics of biodiversity.

  1. Riva & Nielsen 2020

Six key steps for functional landscape analyses of habitat change

  1. Broadley et al. 2019

Space use is one factor affecting detections on CTs. Here, two aspects of space use are considered: home-range size and movement rate.

  1. Naves-Alegre et al. 2022

Results of the spatial and spatio-temporal co-occurrence analyses between pairs of species, both qualitative co-occurrence and quantitative GLMs (spatial co-occurrence) and GLMMs (spatio-temporal co-occurrence) that relate the abundances of the species.

  1. Rodrigues et al. 2022

Synthesis of the observed impacts of land-use transition on mean annual evapotranspiration (ET) and average land surface temperature (LST) in the Cerrado.

  1. Palmer et al. 2022

Dynamic landscapes of fear: understanding spatiotemporal risk.

  1. Grames, Schwartz, Elphick. 2022.

Conceptual flowchart of a systematic process to develop conceptual models of alternative hypotheses in which (a) the scope of the research question is formally defined, (b) a systematic review is conducted, (c) researchers extract authors’ hypotheses as implied causal relationships that are (d) merged into a graphical model that can be (e) analysed to identify trends in scientific thinking.

  1. Magle & Fidino 2018.

Transition probabilities between the three possible states a habitat fragment could transition between from 1 year to the next.

  1. Suraci et al. 2022

Beyond spatial overlap: harnessing new technologies to resolve the complexities of predator–prey interactions.

  1. Gamez & Harris 2022

Conceptual diagram of a vertical forest ecosystem.

  1. Siren et al. 2022.

Forecasting species distributions: Correlation does not equal causation.

  1. Ford & Goheen. 2015.

Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses for a Three-Level Trophic Cascade Involving a Large Carnivore, its Herbivorous Prey, and Plants.

Back to top

References

Broadley, Kate, A. Cole Burton, Tal Avgar, and Stan Boutin. 2019. “Density-Dependent Space Use Affects Interpretation of Camera Trap Detection Rates.” Ecology and Evolution 9 (24): 14031–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5840.
Ford, Adam T., and Jacob R. Goheen. 2015. “Trophic Cascades by Large Carnivores: A Case for Strong Inference and Mechanism.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30 (12): 725–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.012.
Gámez, Siria, and Nyeema C. Harris. 2022. “Conceptualizing the 3D Niche and Vertical Space Use.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37 (11): 953–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.06.012.
Grames, Eliza M., Danielle Schwartz, and Chris S. Elphick. 2022. “A Systematic Method for Hypothesis Synthesis and Conceptual Model Development.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13 (9): 2078–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13940.
Magle, Seth B., and Mason Fidino. 2018. “Long-Term Declines of a Highly Interactive Urban Species.” Biodiversity and Conservation 27 (14): 3693–3706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1621-z.
Naves-Alegre, L., Z. Morales-Reyes, J. A. Sánchez-Zapata, and E. Sebastián-González. n.d. “Scavenger Assemblages Are Structured by Complex Competition and Facilitation Processes Among Vultures.” Journal of Zoology n/a (n/a). Accessed October 16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13016.
Palmer, Meredith S., Kaitlyn M. Gaynor, Justine A. Becker, Joel O. Abraham, Matthew A. Mumma, and Robert M. Pringle. 2022. “Dynamic Landscapes of Fear: Understanding Spatiotemporal Risk.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37 (10): 911–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.06.007.
Pilowsky, Julia A., Robert K. Colwell, Carsten Rahbek, and Damien A. Fordham. 2022. “Process-Explicit Models Reveal the Structure and Dynamics of Biodiversity Patterns.” Science Advances 8 (31): eabj2271. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj2271.
Riva, Federico, and Scott E. Nielsen. 2020. “Six Key Steps for Functional Landscape Analyses of Habitat Change.” Landscape Ecology 35 (7): 1495–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01048-y.
Rodrigues, Ariane A., Marcia N. Macedo, Divino V. Silvério, Leandro Maracahipes, Michael T. Coe, Paulo M. Brando, Julia Z. Shimbo, Raoni Rajão, Britaldo Soares-Filho, and Mercedes M. C. Bustamante. n.d. “Cerrado Deforestation Threatens Regional Climate and Water Availability for Agriculture and Ecosystems.” Global Change Biology n/a (n/a). Accessed October 16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16386.
Sirén, Alexej P. K., Chris S. Sutherland, Ambarish V. Karmalkar, Matthew J. Duveneck, and Toni Lyn Morelli. 2022. “Forecasting Species Distributions: Correlation Does Not Equal Causation.” Diversity and Distributions 28 (4): 756–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13480.
Soares, Filipa C., Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Pedro Cardoso, and Ricardo F. de Lima. n.d. “Bird Extinctions and Introductions Are Causing Taxonomic and Functional Homogenization in Oceanic Islands.” Functional Ecology n/a (n/a). Accessed October 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14196.
Suraci, Justin P., Justine A. Smith, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes, Kaitlyn M. Gaynor, Menna Jones, Barney Luttbeg, Euan G. Ritchie, Michael J. Sheriff, and Andrew Sih. 2022. “Beyond Spatial Overlap: Harnessing New Technologies to Resolve the Complexities of Predator–Prey Interactions.” Oikos 2022 (8): e09004. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.09004.